Showing posts with label Eye-Watering GW Prices. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eye-Watering GW Prices. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Poll Results: Will You Buy the New 40K Imperial Knight?




Our most recent poll was on the topic of the new Imperial Knight model for Warhammer 40K. Both Conscript Greg and myself jumped in with both feet on this one!

But what do you think? We asked:

Games Workshop has released the new Imperial (Knight) Titan model for 40K. Will you buy it?


No - I don't like the model.
  5 (8%)
No - great model but too expensive.
  16 (27%)
No - don't play 40K.
  25 (42%)
Yes - it's fantastic and I don't care what it costs.
  9 (15%)
Yes - the only question is how many I get!!
  4 (6%)

About 40% of the respondents don't play 40K, but of the rest of you who do, about two-thirds either don't like the model or think it's too expensive. But a solid 21% of respondents think it's great and plan to buy one (or more)! I think that for a model that costs well over $100 ($170 CAD retail) that's a pretty good strike rate for GW.

So congrats to Games Workshop for bringing out this great model. It's just too bad that for every Imperial Knight we seem to also get a Taurox...

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

GW - Is There A "Duh" In "Digital"?

"Brazen Claws"? There's an app for that...
Is there a "duh" in "digital"? Maybe we should ask GW.  Like many gamers, I receive regular GW emails about products etc., and the latest breathless missive informed me that GW is "going digital".  I was excited for half a second to think that GW had finally come up with some kind of useful app that would be helpful for gaming.  Considering the iPad had been on the market since April of 2010, and tablet products are common accessories these days (I'm a notorious curmudgeon about Apple and I was still blown away by it - my cynicism was completely pwned by the design skills of Apple) I thought it was about time that GW got on the bandwagon.

My iPad has been quite handy for gaming (Conscript Cam will no doubt savour this admission on my part, as well he should). While I enjoy "Angry Birds" and any number of other time wasting games, it was not long before I was cramming every gaming PDF I could on to my iPad, so I could have them handy while gaming.  I'm not here to proclaim the death of books, etc. etc. I quite enjoy paper books, and enjoy well-produced rule books and hope they continue for a long time.  But it has been very useful to have charts, stats lists etc. available for quick and easy reference.  My copy of the "Tomorrow's War" rules is a digital one, just to name an example, and it is very useful to have it in electronic format on the tablet reader.

Places like the Wargames Vault are offering more and more rules for download.  Even just having the rules in an electronic format is quite handy, and game companies have yet to start to explore the tools that a digital app for gaming might provide. 

"Um, do you have your paper rulebook, because this actually says nothing about the 12 special rules that apply in this situation..."
GW had a great opportunity here, particularly 40k, with its points-driven "armies", scenarios that are functionally the same and separated only by small details, and endless byzantine layers of special rules in its various game products should be a prime candidate to exploit the opportunity presented by tablets like the iPad.  You could have an army builder app.  You could have an app with a handy list of all the tiresome special rules in 40k to help smooth over the games. Just imagine all the cool stuff.  You could even have a dice app or something for iPhones - just give it a shake! Like I said, I was excited for half a second...

But it didn't take long to lose the excitement - in fact, it was gone by the time I was halfway through the marketing email.  Out of all of the initial "offerings", just one is a Codex. The other is a painting book (handy, but again, is that really what is needed up front?), and then some "scrolls".  A distinctly underwhelming initial offer of product.  The digital "opportunity" as a GW player would be to have to carry fewer books, not need books AND my iPad just so I can try and "legally" use some scroll or whatever in a Warhammer game.

Watch out "Plants vs. Zombies" - here comes the Great Cave Squig!
Of all the initial products, the only interesting one (and of any use for gaming) might be the codex.  So I looked it up on the iBook store. The Codex is for sale for the light sum of $49.99 US.  This is actually more than a paper codex - a small amount more, but still more.  A bold attempt to deny the actual economics of how digital publishing actually "works".  If any company would expect you to pay the same or more for a file over a print equivalent, it would be GW, right?

The other GW files are much less expensive than the codex - the "scrolls" are only 99 cents. That is still 99 cents more than they are worth, as they ad very little to the gaming experience. What do you need a scroll for???


No doubt the Space Marine i-Codex has some sort of alleged interactive benefit, which GW could allegedly claim would justify it being more expensive than the paper book.  This is hilarious. If GW thinks I am going to pay MORE for an electronic codex, they have another thing coming. I'm not saying it should be free, or just 99 cents, but charging the same price as the print book, never mind slightly more, points to a rather fundamental misunderstanding of digital economics.  Like every other business which has tried to tame the digital medium with this type of denial/defiance, this approach will serve only to drive more business toward the "waters off Tortuga", where GW has actually been "digital" for years.

GW is hardly the only business to have seen its commercial assumptions blow-torched when applied to the reality of digital mediums. And I can imagine Apple must be a challenging company to deal with - after all, has anyone else managed to push a company like AT&T around? Charging almost $20 for individual figures is one thing - that debate is a spirited one, and who knows how it will play out in the long run. But if GW really thinks that "going digital" means another chance to toss off overpriced stuff, then it is another troubling sign that the geniuses behind "145" are calling too many shots. 

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

More Madness from Games Workshop..."145"


Like many of you, I am on the GW email marketing list.

For the most part, the emails I receive are rather unremarkable. Pictures of new models, announcements, that sort of thing.

[rant]

Then today I got an email announcing a "teaser trailer". "Servitor 13... has managed to intercept a new transmission"!!! Cool, I think. Perhaps a sneaky look at some new models or something.

Then I click through to the video... *SPOILER ALERT* the video consists of the numerals "1", "4", and "5" floating about in a rather dull way. "145"... what could it signify?

a) The number of price increases visited on GW customers in the last 5 years?
b) The number of people worldwide who think Finecast is actually an improvement?
c) The number of meltagun shots possible in one turn from a listhammer 2k points Space Marine army?
d) The number of skulls sculpted onto the latest uber-Chaos Lord model?
e) The number of paints in the new Citadel Colours range?

Correct answer... (e). You can read about the latest Citadel paint rumours all over the Web, but suffice to say that it is the end of the line for Skull White and all of our other old favourites. Gotta change things up a bit to get the old cash flow freed up again, eh? Why have a range of 70-odd paints when you can have over 140... with a corresponding price rise in the "mega paint set" kit. (As an aside, does anyone buy the Mega Paint Set other than single parents trying to buy the love of their child?? or perhaps the same benighted souls who lay out $16 for a can of Citadel primer?)

Anyway, the paint rant is one for another day. This rant is concentrating on an epic fail in GW's marketing department on what is a neat idea (teaser video) executed lamely. I know that some marketing bods would say that any press is good press and the fact that I'm blogging about their piece of **** video is a "win" for the brand. But to me this "teaser trailer" is just more evidence demonstrating the Culture of Fail at GW.

[/rant off]

ps "Adding Comments" was disabled on YouTube... I wonder why??

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

New toy for Epic Orks

It's always nice to dig through the hoard of unpainted minis in my basement (known euphemistically as "pending projects") and find a nice surprise, still in its box. Many, many years ago I purchased an Ork Gargant for Epic 40k from the shelf at Campaign Outfitters. It cost approx $20 Canadian.

Who knows how long it had been sitting there? It then sat more years in my basement. During my Epic re-basing project, I found it in the basement, put it together and painted it. So, better late than never, I guess.




Here is a pic of the model next to the larger, scarier "Great Gargant", which I acquired from Fawcett member Sean M. years ago. It gives a sense of the relative size - I think the Gargant fits into the line at about the same position as the Imperial Reaver Titan - scary, but not the scariest thing.



Now to stomp some humiez! Should make for a good dust-up with the Imperial Guard and a few Titans.

For fun, I checked the GW site for how much it would cost to acquire one today. Only $42 US for a Gargant! Needless to say, much better to find one in the basement.

While I was visiting the GW Web site, I thought I would check the other Epic 40k models, and was floored by just how much the Epic 40k stuff is starting to cost. The Gargant is a great deal compared to the criminal price of $23.75 US for TWO, count em', that's TWO, Wave Serpents. So putting your detachment of eight Eldar units into Wave Serpents for Epic 40k can be done for just about $50 US! What a GREAT DEAL.

It is actually cheaper to order the resin Epic models from Forge World!!

No wonder nobody plays Epic anymore...